- Joined
- Jul 21, 2016
- Messages
- 29
- Reaction score
- 6
- Age
- 61
Well that kinda goes inline with everything else they design.
The lack of backward compatibility is what angers many.
So tell me, can I program the second controller buttons independently or only as per programmed by DJI.
Does the new cendence remote come with standard SMA-connectors for antennas?
Unfortunately not. The stock controller's antennas are not detachable to connect to the Tracktenna.
DJI Tracktenna is fully compatibility with only the Cendence Remote Controller running with Inspire 2 and Matrice 200 series aircraft. Not compatible with third party radios either.
That's correct. You can change anyway to other connectors...I am about 75% positive that it does come with standard SMA connectors. I did not check this on the display unit at NAB (left this afternoon).
I do know that the Tracktenna has an SMA port out and my assumption would be that it would be SMA on the Tracktennas and SMA on the Cendence. I will have to come back to the thread with a definite answer on this.
I assume that tracktenna reads NMEA (and other ) data from dji's own protocol as well as ambience parameters and its own position. I guess you are right about 3rd party RCs and dji RCs with different ligbridge.Unfortunately not. The stock controller's antennas are not detachable to connect to the Tracktenna.
DJI Tracktenna is fully compatibility with only the Cendence Remote Controller running with Inspire 2 and Matrice 200 series aircraft. Not compatible with third party radios either.
Good question... Somehow confusing with all the protocols...I've just read the spec for the I2 (duh) and read that it's an enhanced version of Lightbridge. So am I correct in saying that it's not even LB2?
I'm a bit confused. I was under the impression that inspire 1 was compatible with cendence and tracktenna..
So when does this tracktenna become available? Anyone know any price points?
So when does this tracktenna become available? Anyone know any price points?
It seems the final version isn't ready yet.. and this is good so because the version that was presented is not as mature as it looks on the pictures. As example you would exoect from an antenna tracking system flexibility for antennas. The current version uses antennas that are not very directional. Most people however that want to use an antenna tracker want to limit the angles down to a maybe 18-24dbi antenna. Also I wonder how the 5.8Ghz band is involved. This frequency is not suitable for high penetration or/and long range. next are the cables. If you need longer cables then the ones provided are not good enough. The SMA connectors are fine on the RC but on the tracktenna side it is not practicle.- especially in the winter.... However, the system will work fine for most of the missions. For real critical professional missions I would like to see 18+ dbi antennas, N-connectors. Perfect would be if the GPS data(NMEA data) is not provided via RC and CAN bus only but if there would be an option to get it via USB or wireless and an app for Android or windows that provides the NMEA stream with the right protocol. That saves extra cables through the roof of our van and opens up for other drones ( and Dji gets more customers/sales). The technology isn't very new and it is inexpensive. Dji does a good job in combining it with sensors. RC freaks build trackers since many years now. Ususally some level and compass adjustment and a whole lotta cables. Nice if we could avoid this with the tracktenna!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.