My sentiments exactly. Manufacturer Nanny zones restricting legitimate work cannot be tolerated in my book.
My sentiments exactly. Manufacturer Nanny zones restricting legitimate work cannot be tolerated in my book.Yep, that was me WARNING Inspire near crash error close to NFZ
These NFZ are an issue for commercial work by valid PFAW holders. For the most part, the NFZ is too big, and random, in the morning before the NFZ, we were film in front of a prison (with permission), and no NFZ was in place. This is one of the areas, along with airports, where they are needed.
Its to the point where I have to question wether the DJI range should even be considered for commercial work, as my legal work is being restricted, not by the CAA, but by a manufacturer.
Its not about damage. I would say the drone would just bounce off but its the news, the headlines.
even a client said today he heard about it. We are in trouble if drones get banned and they will. The red tape involved with a commercial flight will simply not be worth it.
You mean ft not M right?2 sides to every story. we have a max flying height of 400m, so why do i see lots of planes or helicopters fly below that? 0-400m is our air space, 400-40,000 is theirs!
Absolutely not. Helicopters operate from surface to their operational ceiling.2 sides to every story. we have a max flying height of 400m, so why do i see lots of planes or helicopters fly below that? 0-400m is our air space, 400-40,000 is theirs!
2 sides to every story. we have a max flying height of 400m, so why do i see lots of planes or helicopters fly below that? 0-400m is our air space, 400-40,000 is theirs!
UAV pilots do not own below 400ft! Understand the laws before posting crap like that! And altitude for pilots is universally measured in ft.2 sides to every story. we have a max flying height of 400m, so why do i see lots of planes or helicopters fly below that? 0-400m is our air space, 400-40,000 is theirs!
i am not bagatelizing this but how sure are they to really be it a drone?
also, it shows that when struck actually nothing really happens... luckiely of course and i also hope it turns out not to be a drone.
if yes the operator should as said above see a big *** charge for doing something reckless like this.
however, imo it shows that the "danger" of a collision is overhyped in some sort. it is dangerous: yes and it should not be taken off the shoulder easaly, a but real threat?
it bounced off probably like a tennis ball hitting the racket you hit it with...
the video is also a negative campaign rather than informative only outlining the bad things.
there will always be dumb as*es like everywhere... 18 dear old get a car for b-day... maybe a rich kid... goes and hits the tree or kills someone...
its a circle.
i repeat and express out that i am not condoning what happened apperantly.
Here is the result of another test..For sure it can be very dangerous, check the bird strike test bellow:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?