- Joined
- Dec 27, 2015
- Messages
- 525
- Reaction score
- 272
- Location
- Nashville, TN USA
- Website
- www.airnashville.net
In my daily reading I saw this article and it made me think about the past 3 years I've been trying to commercialize myself and my equipment/services.
Are Drones Destined to Be Just Another Survey Tool? - Commercial UAV News
Curious to see if others have had similar thoughts to what I'm about to express? It seems that when I first started this endeavor things were significantly different than they are today. And, I'm not so sure what has happened in the past 3 years is all progress or good.
First, equipment has evolved so fast as to make using a UAV a realistic expectation for anyone who has enough money for a Phantom 4, or now, Mavic Pro. I went to a wedding this weekend and spoke with the photography/videography crew and they confirmed this. They have 2 Phantom 4 and their rationale is that even if they crash them they are cheaper than paying a commercial UAV operator and since there is essentially no enforcement of regulations, their risk to reward ratio makes it a "no brainer."
Second, previously the requirement of a section 333 and COA were serious deterrents to the market being flooded with commercial UAV "wanna bees" trying to sell their services. Part 107 has fundamentally changed the landscape in the USA and for better or worse, appears to be flooding the market with legal operators. I spoke with another potential client who said they had just paid one of their regular workers who is also a private sport pilot, to take the Part 107. They then bought a Phantom 4 and he is their PIC for all inspection work and does his regular job when he's not inspecting. Again, their rationale is that the relative cheap price on a UAV far offsets consequences. One successful cell tower inspection with UAV pays for everything.
Lastly, as is illustrated by the article above, software is evolving and being marketed specifically to further drive down the barriers for the average joe to do most anything they currently may be obtaining through an independent UAV operator. This will continue and will further dilute the field.
I look at all this as my fleet approaches replacement age and I've invested vast amounts of time and money and have to ask myself a question. Did all the forecasters who said UAV pilots will be the next explosive area of job growth jump the shark? Honestly, I look at this and as technology advances at a blinding speed and wonder if we are at the precipice of the "UAV pilot / Remote Pilot" being nothing more than a software minder and monitor.
I figure I have to make the decision within 6 months... Do I make the big spend and update the fleet and continue to hunt business or, do I decide to just go back to making it a "hobby with benefits?"
Thanks for your thoughts and reflections in advance...
Are Drones Destined to Be Just Another Survey Tool? - Commercial UAV News
Curious to see if others have had similar thoughts to what I'm about to express? It seems that when I first started this endeavor things were significantly different than they are today. And, I'm not so sure what has happened in the past 3 years is all progress or good.
First, equipment has evolved so fast as to make using a UAV a realistic expectation for anyone who has enough money for a Phantom 4, or now, Mavic Pro. I went to a wedding this weekend and spoke with the photography/videography crew and they confirmed this. They have 2 Phantom 4 and their rationale is that even if they crash them they are cheaper than paying a commercial UAV operator and since there is essentially no enforcement of regulations, their risk to reward ratio makes it a "no brainer."
Second, previously the requirement of a section 333 and COA were serious deterrents to the market being flooded with commercial UAV "wanna bees" trying to sell their services. Part 107 has fundamentally changed the landscape in the USA and for better or worse, appears to be flooding the market with legal operators. I spoke with another potential client who said they had just paid one of their regular workers who is also a private sport pilot, to take the Part 107. They then bought a Phantom 4 and he is their PIC for all inspection work and does his regular job when he's not inspecting. Again, their rationale is that the relative cheap price on a UAV far offsets consequences. One successful cell tower inspection with UAV pays for everything.
Lastly, as is illustrated by the article above, software is evolving and being marketed specifically to further drive down the barriers for the average joe to do most anything they currently may be obtaining through an independent UAV operator. This will continue and will further dilute the field.
I look at all this as my fleet approaches replacement age and I've invested vast amounts of time and money and have to ask myself a question. Did all the forecasters who said UAV pilots will be the next explosive area of job growth jump the shark? Honestly, I look at this and as technology advances at a blinding speed and wonder if we are at the precipice of the "UAV pilot / Remote Pilot" being nothing more than a software minder and monitor.
I figure I have to make the decision within 6 months... Do I make the big spend and update the fleet and continue to hunt business or, do I decide to just go back to making it a "hobby with benefits?"
Thanks for your thoughts and reflections in advance...