- Joined
- Dec 13, 2015
- Messages
- 920
- Reaction score
- 496
- Age
- 77
Yep, nothing but true. No matter how well they are stored and maintained during between-the-seasons hibernation, they will loose the capacity. And yes, they're not made equal. Some may keep charge for 100+ cycles, others may retire around 50. I tend to believe that TB47/48 batteries average lifespan is about 3 years. I just learn that with my set. TB47 has about 60% of total capacity, two TB48's are at around 75% and only one TB48 keeps little above 5000 mAh. All are about 3 years old, having average 50 charging cycles counted and deep cycled recently. Well, time for replacement, I guess ...Not false or BS but fact.
I have been over this in detail many times on the forum.
Yes, manufacturing date has a influence on the capacity remaining in a pack.
- Lipos loose capacity over time whether they are used or not.
- How well they are stored governs their capacity loss over a time period
- Well stored packs will only deminish circa 1 - 2% over a 12 month period
- Poorly stored cells can lose up to 10% or more over the same period.
Lipo cells start loosing their ability to take a full charge/capacity from the moment they leave the production line, whether they are used or not. In fact, the very article you link to highlights differing capacity loss over a year at 40% charge at differing temperatures of storage with the worse being a 25% loss of capacity over a 12 month period.
These are facts and just a well documented physical nuance of Lithium Polymer cell chemistry/technology.
However, one question is bothering me ... Shortened flight time and frequent "Motor overload" messages aside, what potential danger is lurking behind usage of ageing LiPo's? Will I risk an rapid battery failure mid flight, catastrophic voltage drop and my beloved Inspire's funeral in result?