- Joined
- Aug 7, 2013
- Messages
- 10,825
- Reaction score
- 5,701
Hmmmmm... been watching this thread with interest.
There clearly is an 'issue' here (well much the same as every product that DJI has released to date so they are consistent I suppose) however I think Ultra310x may have hit the nail on the head mentioning a thrust bearing.
In order for the Inspire to transform and allow the motors to lean out by a few degrees there has to be rotational movement within that collar with the shorter arm causing the rotation by virtue of it's shorter length.
I would like to be able to do a full tear down of this section of the craft to see how it has been engineered but it would appear to be similar to a rotor hub assembly seen on collective pitch helicopters. The inertial forces in this case being transferred through the arm to the thrust bearing. That being the case I wouldn't mind betting that within that assembly there is also a flange washer (or two) and a damping 'O' ring sitting next to it to absorb the forces and preventing the bearing shaking itself to pieces.
If I AM right and at this stage it's only an assumption based on building many multirotors and building/tearing down and flying too many helicopters I can remember, then those 'O' rings will have a life expectancy and WILL need to be replaced at specified intervals in order to maintain the integrity of the sub assembly.
Again, if my assumptions are correct then DJI are correct in saying that the nut in question should not be overtightened as this will cause the 'O' ring to become compressed which will diminish it's ability to absorb energy and shorten it's life expectancy. It could also cause the bearing to become much stiffer to turn and thus put undue stress on the transformation motor.
Of course, if DJI would stop playing 'Nanny' and give end users correct instructions on how much to tighten this nut we wouldn't be having these conversations.
I expect to see many more 'problems' in the coming days/weeks with this apparent design flaw/weakness/manufacturing QR issue.
My own belief is that DJI over worked the idea of getting a 'coolness' factor into the Inspire design (probably as a selling point) with transformation and this is going to be a weakness of the bird.
If someone want's to shout me down here then fine but I would REALLY like to see a complete teardown of that arm assembly.
There clearly is an 'issue' here (well much the same as every product that DJI has released to date so they are consistent I suppose) however I think Ultra310x may have hit the nail on the head mentioning a thrust bearing.
In order for the Inspire to transform and allow the motors to lean out by a few degrees there has to be rotational movement within that collar with the shorter arm causing the rotation by virtue of it's shorter length.
I would like to be able to do a full tear down of this section of the craft to see how it has been engineered but it would appear to be similar to a rotor hub assembly seen on collective pitch helicopters. The inertial forces in this case being transferred through the arm to the thrust bearing. That being the case I wouldn't mind betting that within that assembly there is also a flange washer (or two) and a damping 'O' ring sitting next to it to absorb the forces and preventing the bearing shaking itself to pieces.
If I AM right and at this stage it's only an assumption based on building many multirotors and building/tearing down and flying too many helicopters I can remember, then those 'O' rings will have a life expectancy and WILL need to be replaced at specified intervals in order to maintain the integrity of the sub assembly.
Again, if my assumptions are correct then DJI are correct in saying that the nut in question should not be overtightened as this will cause the 'O' ring to become compressed which will diminish it's ability to absorb energy and shorten it's life expectancy. It could also cause the bearing to become much stiffer to turn and thus put undue stress on the transformation motor.
Of course, if DJI would stop playing 'Nanny' and give end users correct instructions on how much to tighten this nut we wouldn't be having these conversations.
I expect to see many more 'problems' in the coming days/weeks with this apparent design flaw/weakness/manufacturing QR issue.
My own belief is that DJI over worked the idea of getting a 'coolness' factor into the Inspire design (probably as a selling point) with transformation and this is going to be a weakness of the bird.
If someone want's to shout me down here then fine but I would REALLY like to see a complete teardown of that arm assembly.