I've just imported the 015.DNG to Lightroom on Windows 8 and can't see anything wrong even zoomed right in.
OK great thx. What settings did you use? Any filter? Cheers MarkI've just imported the 015.DNG to Lightroom on Windows 8 and can't see anything wrong even zoomed right in.
More evidence this is just an apple thing which is not great but better than a DJI thing . . .OK great thx. What settings did you use? Any filter? Cheers Mark
Hi Silvertone,
For your information, it might be worth doing the test with a later version of Adobe Lightroom.
I'm using Adobe Lightroom 5.6 with Adobe Camera Raw 8.6. If you upload your DNG to the cloud (Dropbox, Live, Google Drive) I could try it on my version of Lightroom and see if I can pick out artefacts.
The issue may be how the DNG file is read by older versions of the software.
Would you mind if I sent you two files via wetransfer for you to try in LR 5?
Adobe's raw processing software (Photoshop/Camera Raw & Lightroom) has a feature that automatically patches hot/dead/stuck pixels, which is why you are not seeing these sensor defects in Adobe software.
Nearly every camera sensor has these kinds of defects. Most camera makers patch them before writing the raw file to disk. DJI is letting the raw processing software patch the defects. This works fine with Adobe's raw processing software, but not with Apple raw processing software.
[Disclaimer - I work for Adobe]
Adobe's raw processing software (Photoshop/Camera Raw & Lightroom) has a feature that automatically patches hot/dead/stuck pixels, which is why you are not seeing these sensor defects in Adobe software.
Nearly every camera sensor has these kinds of defects. Most camera makers patch them before writing the raw file to disk. DJI is letting the raw processing software patch the defects. This works fine with Adobe's raw processing software, but not with Apple raw processing software.
[Disclaimer - I work for Adobe]
I'm not sure about others but I am seeing the same hot or dead pixels in ACR as I am in Lightroom.
Adobe's raw processing software (Photoshop/Camera Raw & Lightroom) has a feature that automatically patches hot/dead/stuck pixels, which is why you are not seeing these sensor defects in Adobe software.
Nearly every camera sensor has these kinds of defects. Most camera makers patch them before writing the raw file to disk. DJI is letting the raw processing software patch the defects. This works fine with Adobe's raw processing software, but not with Apple raw processing software.
[Disclaimer - I work for Adobe]
Wow, Thomas Knoll posting on this thread! Big fan of your product. Honored by your presence, and thanks for the explanation.
I believe (based on my professional graphics experience) that you will find Photoshop far and away better than Aperture.I flew my I1 for the first time yesterday and just got around to downloading some stills. I took JPGs and DNGs and then imported them into Aperture. I noticed the DNG files have hot pixels while the JPGs do not (see attached samples).
I also opened the DNG file in Photoshop Elements and the DNG file did NOT have the hot pixels so I am going to assume this is an Aperture problem.
DNG files are not acceptable files for upload on this site so I can't share an original.
Just an FYI for Aperture users. I may need to move to Photoshop sooner than I hoped . . . I have sent feedback to Apple via Aperture but it might help get support for the I1's camera if more than one of us did that . . .
Are you THE Thomas Knoll who has been at the forefront of developing Photoshop over the past couple of decades? Thanks of your contribution here - we can all learn a lot from you about imaging and image processing.Adobe's raw processing software (Photoshop/Camera Raw & Lightroom) has a feature that automatically patches hot/dead/stuck pixels, which is why you are not seeing these sensor defects in Adobe software.
Nearly every camera sensor has these kinds of defects. Most camera makers patch them before writing the raw file to disk. DJI is letting the raw processing software patch the defects. This works fine with Adobe's raw processing software, but not with Apple raw processing software.
[Disclaimer - I work for Adobe]
Indeed!That's kind of like Tim Cook saying "I work for Apple."
Wow, Thomas Knoll posting on this thread! Big fan of your product. Honored by your presence, and thanks for the explanation.
I just spent the evening updating my OS to Yosemite so that I could download the newest version of Lightroom since I have Adobe Creative Cloud. The first thing I did was import my Inspire 1 DNG files hoping that the problem would be remedied and it looks exactly the same as they did in Lightroom 4. I must have a faulty camera on my Inspire 1. There are literally thousands of "hot" pixels on these files.
Thanks - I'm going to look into CC. I've been using Aperture for 6 years now and FCPX for a year or so and they currently meets my needs. I am aware that Apple is going to replace Aperture and iPhoto with some consolidated program so I might wait until that comes out to see what it will be like. I'm just not looking forward the monthly subscription and learning curve for the CC.I believe (based on my professional graphics experience) that you will find Photoshop far and away better than Aperture.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.