I was an aerial camera op in the film industry for 2 years. My most "famous" work can be seen in the Longmire series. As a non-Union camera op, me and my PIC didn't get film credits. So don't look for them. I got out of that industry for more lucrative drone endeavors. Now I make "film industry money" without having to stay on set for 10-12 hours. Now I earn "film industry money" in 3 or 4 hours. So...enough with the pissing contest.
I have no dog in your drone fight. I was just saying that, as a guy who has BEEN THERE, your
Inspire 2 modifications are reinventing the wheel. The Alta does the bottom up shots perfectly - and with a better camera. So you don't NEED the
Inspire 2 for that. The Inspire 3 has the increased battery capacity. So you don't need the
Inspire 2 for that.
Your condescending "explanations" explain nothing. 100 out of 100 drone pilots surveyed agreed that modifying an
Inspire 2 to that which your Inspire 3 and Alta ALREADY DO is a complete waste of time....UNLESS...as I said, you're doing it for phun.
To really bring this home...
Not a single production company on the planet is going to hire you or your company because your
Inspire 2 has a top-mounted camera or cobbled-together battery modification. Quite the opposite; the Inspire 3 and Alta will meet contract riders. THOSE are why you will get work.
And I don't think I have to tell you that the first time they have to do a retake because something on the cobbled-together
Inspire 2 fails, your company will be flagged and the event will spread throughout the industry like wild fire. Are you really willing to put all the eggs of your entire production company in that basket? When industry standard equipment fails (like the Inspire 3 or the Alta), some latitude is given. When cobbled-together one-off "inventions" fail, that's a big strike. But that is your call, my friend.
Thanx for the explanation and education.
D