- Joined
- Mar 17, 2015
- Messages
- 8
- Reaction score
- 5
- Age
- 45
OK did a quick comparison between inspire 1 with the T48 vs the T47 vs a PV+. here are the results:
Steady hover, ~6 ft elevation, temperature ~38 C, sunny.
PV+ From 95% to 28%: 14:12
T47 From 99% to 28%: 12:43
T48 From 99% to 28%: 15:34
T48 seems to give a 23% flight time increase with 30% more capacity.
Not very scientific but maybe gives people a ballpark idea.
PS: the phantom moved around a lot more and may ave burned more gas constantly correcting for the perceived PS location whereas the I1 held rock steady.
PPS: I did take picture and movies, played around with settings in all cases. I did not move the gimbal during each test..
PPS: Te PV+ takes longer to satellite lock and you lose more battery before you can take off. IMU etc draws of a smaller battery and takes a relative larger chunk.
Steady hover, ~6 ft elevation, temperature ~38 C, sunny.
PV+ From 95% to 28%: 14:12
T47 From 99% to 28%: 12:43
T48 From 99% to 28%: 15:34
T48 seems to give a 23% flight time increase with 30% more capacity.
Not very scientific but maybe gives people a ballpark idea.
PS: the phantom moved around a lot more and may ave burned more gas constantly correcting for the perceived PS location whereas the I1 held rock steady.
PPS: I did take picture and movies, played around with settings in all cases. I did not move the gimbal during each test..
PPS: Te PV+ takes longer to satellite lock and you lose more battery before you can take off. IMU etc draws of a smaller battery and takes a relative larger chunk.