- Joined
- Jul 12, 2020
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 1
- Age
- 74
My input is leave off the audio. You don't want to get sued for copyright infringement, it's being used commercially.
Thanks! I've got a cover version I will use when I submit it to the client. For now its not being used commercially.My input is leave off the audio. You don't want to get sued for copyright infringement, it's being used commercially.
Trying not to sound harsh, but I stopped doing real estate stuff years ago. I still do a few jobs for some quality companies, but I quickly learned that real estate shots are simply not worth my time. They nickel and dime you to death, and then you are the last on the list to get paid. And then they always find ways to save on the shots, like letting a relative do it, or a neighbor kid, or simply buy a cheap Mavic. Their stills do not need to be all that good (as far as they are concerned) and are easy to shoot. The biggest frustration is that they typically thumb their nose at the FAA for commercial use. I was initially really disappointed, since I thought this was going to be a great tool to improve their business.
Even a cover version, you need permission. And if you’re getting paid OR if it’s going on YouTube, it becomes ‘commercial’.Thanks! I've got a cover version I will use when I submit it to the client. For now its not being used commercially.
I get the audio thing I do and it’ll be pinned up by the time it’s delivered.Even a cover version, you need permission. And if you’re getting paid OR if it’s going on YouTube, it becomes ‘commercial’.
Also, I see some nice shots, but even those get old after about 40 seconds. You want to tell a story, not just take a bunch of different shots. it’s fine to get nice shots, but after 30 seconds you start dropping viewers unless you can convey a story.
I just did and my critique (not criticism - you can charge what ever you like mate) stands. $65 for even one acre is _still_ insane. And you don't know where I live... yes Hawaii, but in Puna... So again, if given the whole "cost of living" thing... your $65 + 106% = $133 - still not worth it and dont know any commercial operators that would either. - Hey, good luck mate and safe flying... AlohaPerhaps you ought to read my lessons learned paragraph again. Why wouldn't you charge that much more. Your cost of living is 106% higher than where I live.
Mahalo and alohaI just did and my critique (not criticism - you can charge what ever you like mate) stands. $65 for even one acre is _still_ insane. And you don't know where I live... yes Hawaii, but in Puna... So again, if given the whole "cost of living" thing... your $65 + 106% = $133 - still not worth it and dont know any commercial operators that would either. - Hey, good luck mate and safe flying... Aloha
Thanks!Nice work... My comment would be that you need a flow, beginning middle end... one of your shots pulling away from the property would make a great end shot, but slower... I think there is too much movement in every shot.... slow it down, have a story and it'll be great.
Precisely — if us as media producers aren’t treated as normal vendor / contractor, what’s the point?Hourly rate? Think about what your local plumber is charging.
If a customer isn’t willing to pay what you think is reasonable, you don’t want them for a customer.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.