Welcome Inspire Pilots!
Join our free DJI Inspire community today!
Sign up

Florida new law takes affect tomorrow!

Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
123
Reaction score
15
Age
44
DRONES

--- SB 766, prohibits the use of aerial drones to capture images that could infringe on the privacy of property owners or occupants. The law allows people to initiate a civil action against a person, state agency or political subdivision that violates the prohibitions. However, the prohibition doesn't include agencies countering the risk of terrorist attacks, police who obtain search warrants that authorize the use of drones, property appraisers making tax assessments, and utilities maintaining their facilities.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2015
Messages
353
Reaction score
98
DRONES

--- SB 766, prohibits the use of aerial drones to capture images that could infringe on the privacy of property owners or occupants. The law allows people to initiate a civil action against a person, state agency or political subdivision that violates the prohibitions. However, the prohibition doesn't include agencies countering the risk of terrorist attacks, police who obtain search warrants that authorize the use of drones, property appraisers making tax assessments, and utilities maintaining their facilities.

Please tell us how Google Earth fairs in all this :rolleyes:
 
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
1,045
Reaction score
382
Age
47
So if one of Florida pilotes offering to be a terrorist and all other pilots are chasing him it's legal!;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: mdomeny
Joined
Feb 23, 2015
Messages
429
Reaction score
50
Age
38
politians a bored and make these nonsense laws to be able to say: we are hard at work!!!
i guess... lol
 
Joined
May 28, 2015
Messages
45
Reaction score
13
Age
72
So does Google have an exemption? Google go slap these guys on the back of their heads to wake them up. So if I am on my property flying and I can see my neighbors house I am breaking the law.
 
Joined
Mar 20, 2014
Messages
3,460
Reaction score
1,675
Location
Boston, MA
Google isn't using drones though. Plus, any street views they have I presume get grandfathered as they were taken prior to the law taking effect.
 
Joined
Feb 9, 2015
Messages
345
Reaction score
136
Location
South Florida
Another reason for me to leave Florida. So pretty much don't fly your drone if it's not directly for a paid gig...with your 333 exemption. People need to quit assuming they're important enough for me to want to film. No dude, I cant see you in your boat from half a mile away. I just don't understand why people make such a big deal about a flying camera.
 
Joined
Aug 5, 2014
Messages
366
Reaction score
52
Would they not have to prove you have taken footage? So just flying is still legal? It's the filming which is not? As they sd is so small just throw it if the police turn up or just eat it! Lol, works for drug dealers!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Soflms
Joined
Feb 9, 2015
Messages
345
Reaction score
136
Location
South Florida
We fly "drones". Way worse than drug dealers! lol Eat your SD card! haha love it. I used to do a lot of riding with my gopro (and lets just say I love wheelies) so I looked into the rules and regs on if police had a right to view the contents of the SD card without enough probably cause or a warrant, but I think it differs state to state. Who knows what the hell the rules are for UAV's. I dont think the FAA even has a full grip on implementing the technology into airspace safely, let alone a full list of rules concerning privacy. Hasn't everyone googled Drone Boning by now? talk about privacy issues HA
 
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
123
Reaction score
15
Age
44
All depends on what assholes you're around! Lol Florida is the number one state where you can sue for just about anything and get paid! Smh! Stupid as laws and dumb people!
 
Joined
Jan 30, 2015
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
657
Location
South Florida, USA
Actually, it states: "Prohibiting a person... from using a drone to capture an image of privately owned real property or of the owner... with the intent to conduct surveillance..."

Surveillance is defined as: "close watch kept over someone or something."

Simply flying over (passing over) a property, at say a hundred feet or more, would not necessarily qualify as "surveillance." That will be the point to debate in the court room. As usual, it all goes back to "intent" as in the vast majority of all such cases.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Soflms
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
33
Reaction score
9
Age
36
Actually, it states: "Prohibiting a person... from using a drone to capture an image of privately owned real property or of the owner... with the intent to conduct surveillance..."

Surveillance is defined as: "close watch kept over someone or something."

Simply flying over (passing over) a property, at say a hundred feet or more, would not necessarily qualify as "surveillance." That will the point to debate in the court room. As usual, it all goes back to "intent" as in the vast majority of all such cases.
Yea I completely got the wrong link, sorry about that.
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
77
Reaction score
13
Age
42
oh trust me. you guys still have it easy. in china, Beijing it's a 122km diameter no fly zone. I had to resort to taping an aluminium foil over the GPS receiver and turning off the NVidia shield GPS so that the software doesn't know where the bird is and flying it completely in ATTI mode.
because of Beijing's no fly zone, I have learned well how to fly within no fly zone with ATTI mode.
 

RGD

Joined
Mar 29, 2015
Messages
83
Reaction score
12
Age
69
DRONES

--- SB 766, prohibits the use of aerial drones to capture images that could infringe on the privacy of property owners or occupants. The law allows people to initiate a civil action against a person, state agency or political subdivision that violates the prohibitions. However, the prohibition doesn't include agencies countering the risk of terrorist attacks, police who obtain search warrants that authorize the use of drones, property appraisers making tax assessments, and utilities maintaining their facilities.
As a Florida flyer I wonder where this goes. If I am out shooting beach video or boats going out the inlet or even just general aerial shots and they are posted on my web site is sounds like I could find myself in court. I guess we will have to wait and seen some cases tested on this.
 

New Threads

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
19,631
Messages
192,122
Members
29,004
Latest member
bwhite505