- Joined
- Jun 22, 2015
- Messages
- 158
- Reaction score
- 25
- Age
- 43
Thank you CottonClub, are those pixhawk and arduino DIY solutions or is a ready to use? How much that solution would cost aprox?Hello Hercules_One! I will try to answer your question if I understood it well!
For the mounting, the system is located under the aircraft at the rear, as Opale Paramodels is used too, in order to face any situation.
I think you will have more answers about that in this video:
For the trigering, it is possible with a 2,4 Ghz receiver, so will need an additional remote control. It works with every PPM Module (Pixhawk, Arduino...)
Thank you CottonClub, are those pixhawk and arduino DIY solutions or is a ready to use? How much that solution would cost aprox?![]()
Personnally, I don't like those Mars parachutes, it looks great at first sight, but I know there's a problem of sticky parachute?? Anyone heard of that? because I don't want to spend so much money for something that don't deploy correctly. And I think for that price, you can find something more reliable than this.
Overall I think Opale is a cheaper and better option, folding is easy with practice and one man can do it. Also, I personally don't trust mayday, but that's my opinión. Prefer a remote trigger.Ok I have finally bought the Inspire mounting plate, Mars 58 and Mayday. I have just finished installing it and here are my first observations. I made the purchase because we suffered a recent accident with a prop coming off so really a bit of a panic decision - paying a total of 614 euros for the kit.
First the mount for the Inspire for 170 euros is a few bits of self-assembly plastic, a carbon fibre plate and two carbon fibre supports to fix the unit to the Inspire. They are assembled using supplied bolts into (self tapping!) pre-drilled holes.
Once assembled attached you then have to re-thread the parachute into the case and this is where your problems are likely to start. After some searching I found the (poor quality) video on how to refold and insert the parachute into the container. Three people (all experienced technicians) and a few hours later we managed to stuff the parachute into a small enough size to actually get the lid locked down. This is almost impossible to do single handed as you have to press the package in against a spring greatly stressing the base of the unit attached to the aircraft - in fact I'm sure at some stage unless you have someone to support it, with the amount of force required to insert the chute it will eventually just snap off.
The other problem is that the only way of securing the whole package into the tube is with a single hex key slotted through two holes in the top. Again almost impossible to do on your own. Also there is a great danger of damaging the chute as you do it as it is such a tight fit. Maybe this will become easier with experience but for a unit which costs 430 euro this is one of the worst engineered 'user friendly' designs I have seen in a long time. Perhaps someone will make a 'tool' that assists with the spring compression
The Mayday unit attaches simply with some velcro and is easy to setup after downloading a firmware update. I'm using a 1S lipo which seem to work well.
After the struggle, on the plus side the whole unit is reasonably light and looks good on the back of the aircraft but does obstruct the back LED.
Is it worth the money? If it saves your aircraft, of course it is but I would certainly look around for a cheaper option - this kit is hugely overpriced.
Check if the servo will work with 1S. Mayday board may work even with 3.3V but servomotor will need 5V. If less then it won't have enough power to open the mechanism.I'm using a 1S lipo which seem to work well.
Overall I think Opale is a cheaper and better option, folding is easy with practice and one man can do it. Also, I personally don't trust mayday, but that's my opinión. Prefer a remote trigger.
I have exactly same opinion that's why I prefer to use Stop Flyaway. But in some cases you have no time to press the button.I appreciate a remote trigger being more reliable that leaves you in control.
Thanks for the video, but completely biased, or not well executed. The first test was with motors on, hence not free falling and not able to inflate the parachute. The second was operator error of not pulling the trigger, or was mayday?
Have you ever try it? One thing I have noted on video, on the last part it shows Inspire with legs lowered, however in flying mode legs are in upper position and when you land with parachutes the lowest point is gimbal and camera. No matter how much parachutes you will have on your Inspire, the gimbal will be damaged when landed on it. As for me I see this video kinda suspicious.It's pricey (euphemism spotted) but it's the best solution imo.
Have you ever try it? One thing I have noted on video, on the last part it shows Inspire with legs lowered, however in flying mode legs are in upper position and when you land with parachutes the lowest point is gimbal and camera. No matter how much parachutes you will have on your Inspire, the gimbal will be damaged when landed on it. As for me I see this video kinda suspicious.
I have my own parachute modules for I1 but I always ask guys to connect parachute's rope to the bottom of Inspire, so in emergency it will land upside down and the gimbal will not touch the ground. Also parachute is deployed to the back side of Inspire to turn it upside down.
And price of 1990€ is unreal high. I must raise my $113 to $1113)
Can you take some pictures of how this system is installed on your Inspire?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.