The beauty of this situation for DJI, I think, is that prevailing in a lawsuit against a company in China would be a monumental task. The USA would certainly get no cooperation from the Chinese government and how would you collect? I suspect (and I can't say that I KNOW) that the protection enjoyed by them due to the boundary of the Atlantic Ocean and governmental hostilities makes it pretty easy to ignore the complaints of customers who are upset about the props and other perceived problems. Maybe DJI isn't ignoring complaints at all, and are feverishly working on certain issues, but it certainly isn't made apparent by responses like "there isn't a problem."
Attorneys definitely go after the deep pockets but in the meanwhile my aircraft have registration numbers on them that are attributed to me, so the perceived problems that I have the power to address are going to have my attention.
I sure as heck don't want to ground MY aircraft and I need to know that I'm doing what I can - and Fickert appears to know what he's doing.
I still like my DJI aircraft, by the way.
Attorneys definitely go after the deep pockets but in the meanwhile my aircraft have registration numbers on them that are attributed to me, so the perceived problems that I have the power to address are going to have my attention.
I sure as heck don't want to ground MY aircraft and I need to know that I'm doing what I can - and Fickert appears to know what he's doing.
I still like my DJI aircraft, by the way.
Last edited: