slim.slamma Joined Jan 12, 2015 Messages 1,962 Reaction score 568 Location Worldwide Dec 2, 2016 #1 https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...si-A7EAjacR2FDMFw&sig2=o8jHm9lOwm5OybY985_d8w A step in the right direction for the FAA.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...si-A7EAjacR2FDMFw&sig2=o8jHm9lOwm5OybY985_d8w A step in the right direction for the FAA.
Pescatoral Pursuit Joined Mar 29, 2016 Messages 262 Reaction score 84 Location Orlando Dec 3, 2016 #2 This is more politically motivated, than anything related to the "not allowed to fly over crowds" clause.
This is more politically motivated, than anything related to the "not allowed to fly over crowds" clause.
slim.slamma Joined Jan 12, 2015 Messages 1,962 Reaction score 568 Location Worldwide Dec 3, 2016 #3 Pescatoral Pursuit said: This is more politically motivated, than anything related to the "not allowed to fly over crowds" clause. Click to expand... True but at least I don't have to read about illegal drones operating over and near police without authorization. So thanks to a Part 107 pilot shouldn't be anymore negative news coverage concerning drones.
Pescatoral Pursuit said: This is more politically motivated, than anything related to the "not allowed to fly over crowds" clause. Click to expand... True but at least I don't have to read about illegal drones operating over and near police without authorization. So thanks to a Part 107 pilot shouldn't be anymore negative news coverage concerning drones.