Thanks for this - but I don't quite understand your logic. The base price is $10/hr and Larry's post very clearly indicated he was near a university / school which is why the rate was $15/hr. He seemed to think it was good value as does frankly every other post on this forum and others.
I am curious as to how you arrived at $131,000 per year for something that costs $10/hr? Are you saying you fly 13,100 insurable hours per year (8,733 if you assume an average of $15)? There are only about 360 total possible flying hours in a month (assuming a 12 hour day of non-stop flight)? I think something may be a tad off in your calculations...
Most users do not fly every single day for the year. Some weeks they do, but some they don't, and some have an off season. Some people find the application process and upfront payments for annual policies prohibitive. Some people just want to align their income with their costs and not take risks on long term expenses. Some people have annual policies on one or two drones but want to use the others they have in production with real clients from time to time and want a flexible solution.
This is who Verifly is for - and from the feedback we are getting it seems there are a lot of people who will benefit substantially from having another customer-centric insurance option for operators to choose from. We listen to the community, and if some people want longer term options we will explore them, just like any other product feature.
The policy Verifly delivers is underwritten by Global Aerospace, a leading aviation insurer, and was built from the ground up to be an aviation policy specific to drones, both in the scope of protection and the pricing structure. You can see a sample policy here:
Can I see a sample policy before I purchase? - Verifly Support
If you want to discuss further please email me jay at verifly dot com and I would be happy to discuss.
Jay
Hi Jay,
Thanks for the reply (and the report which goes to me!). Your report states that my post contains factual inaccuracies, I'm not sure it does based on my premise that my insurance covers me 24/7/365!
I could arguably say the same about your post since Global do not actually Insure anything - they simply underwrite on behalf of a pool and therefore are not actually on risk themselves but mearly constitute a 100% fronting arrangement. Global will obviously take a percentage of each risk/cover issued for fronting, with you guys being offered a binder to issue the certs? Is that inaccurate? Please correct me if I am mistaken.
Additionally, you may wish to confirm but last time I checked, Virginia, Washington and Kentucky all had statutes in place actually prohibiting binding arbitration clauses in insurance contracts so you may need to check your terms and conditions if offering cover and issuing policies for and on behalf of Global Aerospace underwritten by the pool in those States - again, please correct me if I am wrong.
However, I do not want to get into the technicalities of the underwriting logistics (we would be here all day

).
I
am actually allowed an opinion believe it or not (its what makes the world interesting) which is why I mentioned above 'IMO'
Whilst I understand many will find this kind of product useful, obviously it is not a case of one size fits all.
I simply based my calculations on $15x24x365 which is $131,400 for annual cover.
My UAV's are covered 24hours a day/365 days a year for numerous perils - not just whilst airborne!
Even if we take a realistic flight pattern of say flying 3 times a week for a couple of hours a day (my flight sessions are rarely less than an hour) and we take an average price of $12 per hour with say 4 weeks off for holidays etc.
Then we come out at 3 x 2 x 48 x $12 = $3,456 annually and this will not protect the aircraft (and ancillary equipment) against theft or PD in the event of a crash or the pilot against business interruption or data protection claims. This is why I said as a pure aviation liability cover, this can work out proportionally expensive for some.
For this reason people should look at exactly what they want from a policy (commercial operators as well as hobbyists) and think carefully whether this is the right product for them. If you are flying regularly/commercially this type of hourly rate structure can actually (and does in my case by a large margin) work out much more expensive and not give the spread of coverage an annual policy affords.
I am not trying to rubbish your product since for many it will serve a purpose. I am mearly offering an opinion and a warning that individuals should do their homework (as I am sure you do when shopping around for Homeowners or Vehicle coverage) and make sure it is right for them and that costs over a 12 month period are not disproportionate compared with an annual policy.
Just my two cents........
